Data Sources and Corrections

The two kinds of claim on this site

First-party. Anything about how the game works — the six classes, the ten weapon stances, what the 30 July balance pass changed, the release date and price — traces to Bellring Games’ own Steam page, Developer Updates or patch notes. You can open those and check us. Where a page states one of these, it names the update it came from.

Second-hand. Every number in the weapon, armour and accessory tables comes from mistfallhunter.wiki. Bellring Games has published no figures of this kind, so there is nothing first-party to compare them against. Those rows are marked second-hand in the tables themselves.

We do not present the second kind as though it were the first. That is the whole distinction this page exists to make.

Why we think that wiki’s numbers were read out of the game files

Not because it says so — it does not say where its data came from. Three things point that way:

• It carries fields a player cannot see in-game, including an average vendor price and an internal item value.
• It was registered on 8 June 2026, seven weeks before the game released on 29 July, which implies access to a pre-release client.
• Its 2,867 edits come from a single account, which is a script filling a template rather than a community writing pages.

This matters in both directions. Extracted data is precise, and it is also frequently ahead of what has shipped — a value in the files is not necessarily a fact about the game people are playing today.

What we changed while importing

Thirty corrections across nine kinds. Nothing was fixed silently; the full log ships with the site’s source.

What was wrong	Times	What we did
Loot chests filed as chest armour	11	Excluded. The game uses chest for both a torso slot and a container, and the eleven containers carry no stats to tabulate.
Percent sign on the wrong side — +%4 beside +4%	6	Read both as the same value.
type and category transposed	3	Treated as armour, on the strength of their defence values.
Rarity declared but unused in a table	3	Removed, so no filter returns an empty table.
Attack Power / Power Attack / Attack	2	Folded into one stat. No item carries two of them, and the odd ones sit beside identical pieces that use the third.
An item carrying another item’s name	2	Used the page title. Fearless Breastplate was labelled Emissary Leather Armor — a different class’s chest piece — and Rosen Oath Helmet had an “Ace” prefix none of its four set-mates have.
Magical Damage vs Magic Damage	1	Folded into one.
Block Damage Reduction Rate vs Block Damage Reduction	1	Folded into one.
A row that contradicts a first-party statement	1	Kept and flagged — see below.

The count of armour pieces is 135 rather than the 146 a straight import produces, almost entirely because of the eleven containers. The corrected set comes to exactly 27 pieces in each of the five slots, which is itself a sign the classification is now right.

The three things we could not settle

A weapon assigned to the wrong class. Deathclaw Hunter, a Legendary dual blades, is listed as a Blackarrow weapon. The other five dual blades all belong to the Shadowstrix, and Bellring Games described the Blackarrow as carrying only the Bow at launch. Either the source mislabelled it, or it is content that has not shipped — and from outside those look identical. The value stays in the table with a footnote saying so.

Seven earrings with no data. Bell, Crow Bone, Demonic Stone, Light Feather, Sharp Barbs, Spirit Serpent and Triquetra are listed as Epic and carry no stats, no class and no value. They appear in the accessory table as empty rows rather than being dropped, because “nobody recorded what this does” and “this does nothing” are different statements and only one of them is true.

One figure off the pattern. Critical damage resistance on Legendary helmets reads 7 where every other resistance at that rarity reads 7.2. It may be a real difference or a rounding slip upstream. We left it as we found it.

What would improve this

Anything read off a running client. A player who can open the game and check a figure has better evidence than this entire page — first-party observation beats a second-hand extraction, even a tidy one. The earrings are the clearest gap: seven items where a single screenshot would settle what nobody has written down.

If a figure here disagrees with your game, your game is right. Tell us via the contact page and we will correct it and say that we did.